Friday, March 6, 2009

Dev D(2009)






Director: Anurag Kashyap

Language: Hindi

Kashyap arrived on the scene a few years back with "Black friday" based on the Mumbai blasts. It had its shortcomings but made us wait for his "Paanch", which never came out. Then came "No smoking" and Anurag took Hindi cinema on a ride, a bumpy roller-coaster ride. With "Dev D" the ride comes a full circle. Kashyap has finally given Bollywood what it deserves, a true masala entertainer for the serious cine-lovers. Shed all your inhibitions, this is not your regular Hindi movie. It is a tale of lust, love, lust, obsession, lust, psychedelia and lust. Bollywood finally grows up, with the help of a man who has disgraced the silver screen more than once before. Devdas Mukherjee had always been an epitome of self pity, drunkenness and failed love in Indian cinema. Dev Dhillon is instead an absolute bastard who fondles other women and cracks up at rumors of Paro kissing someone else. Dev Dhillon is essentially just another avatar of Devdas Mukherjee, yet so very different. He drowns himself in vodka, does coke, calls up Paro's house at 4 in the morning, yet he sees Chanda's face when he closes his eyes. Dev D doesn't believe in "moving on", yet he truly does by the end of the film.
What Kashyap does to the much cliched tale is quite unexpected. It has always been about the man, Devdas himself. Kashyap, on the other hand, examines each and every character with utmost sincerity. He gives us the two of the strongest female leads in Indian cinema. Paro sends her nude pictures to Dev, carries a mattress on a bicycle to a field to have sex with Dev and ultimately, on being refused, manages to have her revenge too. Lenny on the other hand is not afraid being filmed while she gives a blowjob to her boyfriend, or accusing her father of getting aroused by her mms, or becoming Chanda by night. Kashyap gives these characters various shades of gray and turns them from mere props to symbols of women empowerment. Not that he accomplishes this all alone. He is helped by the wonderful Mahi Gill and Kalki Koechlin. Kalki's almost deadpan expressions, indifferent moaning and impish smiles alongwith Mahi's big eyed passionate looks mark their arrival on the big scene. Abhay Deol is fantastic as Dev. The use of light throughout is brilliant. Kashyap uses different shades of blue, pink to set the dark, often brooding mood of the film. I already talked about the music before. How it was all different and stuff. But what I was amazed to find was all the 18 songs were used in the film. And still the film didn't stall for a single moment! Kashyap makes use of the music wonderfully well, sometimes to tell a part of the story and take it forward, sometimes to compliment the mood and sometimes just as a background score. His use of music is actually reminiscent of Godard. I don't know if its only me or Lenny reading Moravia's "Contempt" with Brigitte Bardot on the cover alongwith the use of music is really a tribute to the French master. I hope it is because it would be a most befitting one. Kudos to Mr.Kashyap for finally giving us a nouvelle vague Devdas.

P.S : Did anyone else notice three random guys in the film? Once when Dev first goes with Chunni to Chanda's den, next when Dev drunk drives and almost crashes his car? Even if you did, did anyone else think they were the three horsemen of apocalypse? Gah! I see too much into everything!

7 etceteras:

March Hare said...

clutch your heart and prepare to DIE from the shock, because for ONCE i agree wholeheartedly with anything you have to say about a film.

yes. i know. i read it and almost keeled over from shock myself.

maxratul said...

:) three horsemen? :P

Anonymous said...

I liked teh film Dev d a lot and then got more excited after reading this review (specially my excitement for Anurag kashyap's new film 'Gulaal" became much more) :)

Amazing Graze said...

so u finally managed to watch this one. :)
i don't think i'll get to watch watchmen though. :(

Hatturi Hanzo said...

@march are
there are more things in heaven and earth ityadi.

@ratul
hehehe :D

@tumpy
:D

@amazing greys
yes. I did. finally! it was worth all the wait. and i heard "watchmen" hasn't released yet in India. for once i am happy to be in the US :D

idle-labour said...

I had to return to this review since I watched the film last night. I agree with all of it, especially the three men part (the accident, visiting Chanda...and it was just doing nitpicks on my mind as I was clutching on my brains in SPSS...)..probably they could be the three guys who dance to when Dev drinks on a bar where he meets Chuni? (The one sequence when "O pardesi" plays on in the background). Probably or most probably not.

However I felt that Kashyap could have done better with the tempo of the film...it kinda drags with the have-to-etch-out-the-characterization part somewhere in the middle....and the story somewhat loses its steam. But this was probably for half an hour, and well, this is definitely arguable, but my point is: when one could be so brilliant in other aspect, one could probably use some more care in being unarguably best in everything else! Maybe it's too much of a demand/aspiration but that's how a director could get on and go by...

Aside from this tad bit, the movie is absolutely delightful!

Sami said...

Dude, I have always respected your take on films during our li'l tit bits on the Movie club forum in orkut. However, with Dev D, it is a different story.

The film promises some ball fucking visual brilliance- and that is about it. The story victimizes the characters from a third person perspective... blatantly narrating the tale with the least of involvement of any sort. Not for a moment did I actually feel the anger/pathos/ resentment/delirium (okay I identified a bit with the delirium... my bad!) portrayed by the characters. One of the primary reasons was bad editing- it made the cuts at the wrong places (not always... but there were moments where I noticed it).

Chanda's character had some potential man! He could have made us scream with it! But she drops into the scene almost as a dead bug, plays her role and over.

I don' think a good movie intends to weave a world where the audience is a mere spectator. The audience should feel for the characters... if it fails, I guess it fakes to its viewer.